- ignorance of the law. The Duval County Property Fraud Alert System: Litigating Home Title Fraud. The ADA Americans with Disability Act, or Unruh Act violations or non-compliance claimed and modifications requested are not Readily Achievable and the building was build _______ before the enactment of the various ADA laws and regulations were enacted. 8(c) requires a party to "set forth affirmatively . *IMPORTANT - READ CAREFULLY: Past results do not guarantee, warrant, or predict future case outcomes. Admitted. 2. 420 West Mariposa Road, Suite 200 Shortly thereafter, Transamerica deposited the proceeds of the Policy into the court pursuant to 28 USC 13325(a)(2). Tucson, Maxey v. Jefferson County Sch. stream The information contained in the forms on this website cannot and must be relied on for the purposes of filing legal documents or otherwise pursuing a claim. 656, 666 (S.D.N.Y. Assumption of risk. Read more here. A party served with a pleading stating a cross-claim . Interpleader 1369 - Multiparty, Multiform Jurisdiction (mass accident statute) . Admitted. Pl & Pr. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 (1977)). Forms 146:14 (2d ed.) Note the one affirmative defense for ADA lawsuits regarding Not Readily Achievable (as sort of Grand Father or Grand Fathered in ADA Defense) needs to be adjusted for each case where it might apply). Like its federal counterparts, CPLR 1006(a) enables a stakeholder who faces liability as a result of conflicting claims to an asset, but has no interest in that asset, to commence an interpleader action against the competing claimants, and compel them to litigate the matter among themselves. This is a complex issue and the above wording needs to be adjusted for each case and set of facts. In many cases, an interpleader action arises due to an individual receiving settlement funds meant for the payment of multiple bills. P. 10 . SK6F7ETKn ~vC;,pr_\,Wy~m/\%)*5bIx . This is part of Vail Law's Litigation Checklist. CO 11. The Policy was later transferred to Plaintiff, SPV-LS LLC (SPV). See Penn Mutual's Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Interpleader, Exhibit J (identifying the discussion date as August 4, 2009). Managing Partner An example of an interpleader involving health care providers. The Sample Answer, which is one form of Respose, to a ADA Lawsuit, Busienss, or Real Estate Lawsuit filed in a California Superior Court, or in the case of an ADA lawsuit, filed in part in Federal District Court for ADA claims. 15. Arbitration and award. 28 U.S.C. See Noerr-Pennington Doctrine (2009), ABA Section of Antitrust Law, at p.107. AS AND FOR A SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE: . To achieve that, the party holding the asset files . City of N.Y., the Southern District of New York likewise denied certification of issues pertaining to the city's purported liability for failure to train the New York Police Department, holding that the affirmative defense of probable cause required "such an intensive, individualized inquiry" that "the proposed certification fails to . Rule 8(c) requires that both defenses to liability and defenses that potentially mitigate damages must be set forth in the pleadings. Typically, once the stakeholder deposits the res into the court (for example, the face value of the insurance policy), the stakeholder is released from the action and the claimants proceed against each other to determine which of them is legally entitled to the res. A defense. Lamber Goodnow Personal Injury Counsel Center: A Resource for Attorneys. Definition of Denial or Failure of Proof and Affirmative Defenses. Ensure information regarding the bill is accurate within the interpleader. ,4~WNv"Qp&n:+7A8{uU[2[7CS'pvlzavGW3}qUCD-y;1#^k_::% 4Km&&-1$!NQK!gFA%r+bK,|TH0;#]ppB,e*8aLm/ 8 Fp"34/lcHU`N#
{ekKLG r* CTRju\Q3:s -CO!>"# )*76s
J6m&ob$&I^2=[,jwpS}#8EA. Thereafter, the automatic stay in the Bankruptcy Action was lifted, and the Bankruptcy Action was dismissed. Because of the competing claims to the Policy proceeds, Transamerica refused to distribute the proceeds. Truck-A-Tune, Inc. v. Re, 23 F.3d 60, 63 (2d Cir. As the vast majority of these affirmative defenses will not apply to any given case, ensure you don't just plead this entire laundry list - this list is intended as a brainstorming tool. sOTO'/,SZ+&'DN; o/0r;+CW The second stage is like an action at law to determine which of the claimants is entitled to the res. The insurance company believes that the deceased committed suicide, but the claimants believe the death was by accident. 5. The defendant in a declaratory suit can seek affirmative relief and sue on the basis of any cause of action that may be appropriate in a An affirmative defense is an argument that Plaintiff's claim should fail for some procedural or legal reason. 1994). The court concluded that there had been no action or inaction on the part of the plaintiff that could be interpreted to be a recognition of the fact that the defendants intended to claim attorneys' fees or a waiver of objection to their failure to plead such a claim. Accordingly, while pleadings may be amended to add additional affirmative defenses, it is essential that all defenses to be raised at trial are pleaded before trial (ideally, at least a week prior to the deadline to serve written discovery in a case). Prompted by this discussion, Petitioner filed this action against Jeremy Toler, Jennifer Toler and Penn Mutual. That Plaintiff take nothing by reason of the unverified Complaint herein, and that these answering Defendants be dismissed hence; 2. %PDF-1.3 1335, 1397, and 2361. 2017) (internal citations omitted). The only beneficiary in using bogus affirmative defenses is the guy getting paid for putting them in there. The Defendants incorporate herein by reference the responses to paragraphs (1) . See, e.g. It is not uncommon for a person or entity holding money to be placed in a situation where multiple parties claim entitlement to the funds being held. There are specific differences between Statutory Interpleader, and Rule Interpleader: In bankruptcy court interpleader under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 22 may be maintained as an adversary proceeding under Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 7022. Defenses are set forth by a defendant in his answer to the complaint. 4. Professionals at the Lamber Goodnow legal team are just a click or call away. {Facsimile: }, In the Superior Court of the state of Arizona 16. 4. Section 475.25(1)(d)1., Florida Statutes, sets for the statutory procedure that real estate professionals should follow in the event of conflicting binder claims. - ignorance of the law. Nogales, 89501. One specific situation commonly seen in the reported cases is where the policyholder was allegedly murdered by a beneficiary (which would disqualify that beneficiary from receiving any proceeds).[2]. [23] A plaintiff may now argue that neither of the claimants has a right to the property at issue. What Should You Do If Youre In An Accident? 1335 . Co. v. Ferndale Dev. 956 that authorized the interposing of equitable defenses in actions at law. Matters outside of these jurisdictions are handled by Fennemore Craig, P.C., lawyers licensed in the relevant jurisdiction or by or with the assistance of attorneys at other associated, co-counsel law firms who are licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. Copyright 2008-2023 Jimerson Birr, P.A. Regardless of how they are styled, the vast majority of these defenses will not apply in any given case, review of the complete list may be an especially helpful tool in brainstorming at the outset of a case. The insurance company is ready, willing, and able to pay the policy proceeds in specified percentages to named beneficiaries as last directed by the policyholder, but becomes aware of a dispute among them and/or third parties as to who are the proper beneficiaries or the proper distribution of proceeds among the beneficiaries. Defendant affirmatively alleges that it provided. Defendant denies the allegations contained in Paragraphs [] of the Complaint. SEE ALSO: Default Motions and Judgments (Research Guide) DEFINITIONS: "The defendant in the answer shall specially deny such allegations of the complaint as the defendant who intends to AZ That the Court grant such other and further orders as appropriate and just. 5. Dist. Defendants moved to dismiss. You can explore additional available newsletters here. 9. They are a potent procedural weapon to defeat or diminish the plaintiff's claim or claims. See Great Am. Bankers Trust Co. v. Hogan, 196 A.D.2d 469 (1st Dept. Defendant is informed and believes and, based thereon, alleges that Plaintiff has engaged in conduct and actions to constitute a novation concerning the obligations, conduct, or acts at issue in the Complaint, barring recovery from Defendant. - All Rights Reserved, Community Advocacy & Social Responsibility. Bd. District Attorney of N.Y. County v. The Republic of The Philippines, No. Admitted. 80203, 702-625-7777 12. (/XCrBK&^`z17'tRn1"nv
Su2%k!6XZ>KlNA>h|tw~bO/F#hig)0yInD%>`?%b"&aQ|E:QmxO,5D>'AyY];8JB )b8=`=464&Ad(sm\kM}zxFm5qH8VELM$xdLw#,xvc7f5}?/XoldM877\5l[wQ59-} dHBFpS7:dVaOYm!D?\l`ji Lets talk about your legal issues. 7. In 1936 the Federal Interpeader Act was again repealed and replaced by the Federal Interpleader Act of 1936, 49Stat. Alexander v. Riga, 208 F.3d 419, 432 (3d Cir. 1991). That the Court award $[] of the interpleaded funds to Defendant []. Red Rock ignored the statute governing the distribution of the proceeds of the HOA sale in 2014 & also refused requests to distribute in 2014 & 2016 and in civil actions in 2017, 2019 . Affirmative Defenses Counterclaims Crossclaims Answer to Crossclaim/Reply to Counterclaim See state court rules or Fed. 8. [24] The policy must have a value of at least $500 claimed were claimed or may be claimed by adverse claimants; which is less than the amount in controversy of $3,000 in Judicial Code 48(1) then required for general diversity jurisdiction and two or more of the beneficiaries must live in different states. Freiberger Haber LLP is a national law firm located in Melville Long Island & New York City. 89101, 520-394-4733 ), https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interpleader&oldid=1086508887, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, The same thing, debt, or duty must be the. Interpleader had its origins as a civil procedure at common law, which was later adopted and expanded by the Court of Chancery in its equitable jurisprudence. 85016 These 19 affirmative defenses published here are one section of what Nona filed on 3/8/21 to get the money that Red Rock stole and to get penalties and damages. This single volume reference guide presents a practice-oriented approach where the rules are discussed in . Defenses may either be negative or affirmative. Note that, unlike affirmative defenses where the defendant bears the burden of proving the defense, some of the following are more properly styled "additional defenses" where the plaintiff bears the burden of proving that the defense does not apply (e.g. It is designed to eliminate multiple lawsuits over the same stake and to protect the stakeholder from actual or potential liability. l"dngf G. Goodnow is licensed in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New York and Washington D.C. (inactive) only. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google, There is a newer version of the California Code. 1335. The defendant might not have any affirmative defenses. the provisions of Rule 85.5 impose no time limit by which the application under that Rule must be made by the creditor or other party claiming an interest. Defendant may plead inconsistent defenses. Rule 22.01: Generally. In and for the County of Maricopa, ANSWER BY DEFENDANT [ENTITY] TO COMPLAINT IN INTERPLEADER. claimed no interest in the subject-matter in dispute other than for charges or, did not collude with any of the claimants to that subject-matter; and. Given the competing claims to the funds, the holder can wait for the parties to resolve their dispute or file an interpleader action asking the court to decide who should get the funds being held. [1], Suppose a person dies with a valid life insurance policy in effect. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES. See id. List of Possible Affirmative Defenses ("If you don't raise, you might have waived"). requires a party to "set forth affirmatively . 29, 2018) (citing Bradley v. Kochenash, 44 F.3d 166, 168 (2d Cir. You're all set! A well stated affirmative defense - even if its a little bit of a reach - can intimidate a plaintiff, and possibly help persuade him or her to settle. For costs of suit incurred herein; and. Among other things, Plaintiffs alleged that Defendants tortiously interfered with the Policy by interpleading the Policy proceeds in the South Dakota Action. Rule 22.02 provides for deposit with the court of any property or amount involved as to which the party seeking interpleader admits liability. In order for this court to have jurisdiction over this action, at least two defendants must be citizens of different States as defined in 28 U.S.C. Admitted. Disclaimer| Site Map| Privacy Policy |Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters, 2023 The Karlin Law Firm LLP All Rights Reserved, Disclaimer| Site Map| Privacy Policy |Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters, Sample General Denial Answer with Affirmative Defenses filed in California Superior Court or Federal ADA, Business or Real Estate Lawsuit with Affirmative Defenses. 8. In Louisiana interpleader is called concursus. In the summons and complaint, the title of the action must include the names of all parties. For example, the plaintiff made a procedural mistake, like not serving the defendant properly or the case was filed after the statute of limitations. 2005) Because the failure to act immediately upon receipt of a summons in an interpleader action may have devastating financial consequences for rightful heirs and beneficiaries, it is critical to retain an attorney experienced in handling interpleader cases as soon as possible to protect your rights. 931 approved June 25, 1948, it was reconstituted as 28U.S.C. What is an Interpleader Action? The Leading Law Firm In The Nation For ADA Legal Defense, On Behalf of The Karlin Law Firm LLP | Jun 29, 2012 | Real Estate Disputes |. Q: How can I answer the complaint in Interpleader? This means that the time to bring the cause of action has as a matter of law. Rule 8(c) requires that both defenses to liability and defenses that potentially mitigate damages must be set forth in the pleadings. Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, "An Historical and Critical Analysis of Interpleader", Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Tull, An Act to enable Courts of Law to give Relief against adverse Claims made upon Persons having no Interest in the Subject of such Claims, "Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007", "The Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (Commencement No. Defendant denies that Plaintiff is entitled to the relief requested in Paragraph [] of the Complaint. a person is under a liability in respect of a debt or any money or goods and he is, or expects to be, sued for or in respect of the debt, money or goods by two or more persons making adverse claims thereto. Arbitration and award. 2003), - failure to take advantage of effective system to report/stop harassment (in Title VII actions, called the Faragher-Ellerth defense) (see Jones v. D.C. Dept. First Affirmative Defense ., 523 P.2d 979 (Colo. 1974). 1335, 1397, and 2361. {Telephone:} The Court easily disposed of the tortious interference with contract claim, finding that Transamerica did not breach its contract with SPV by interpleading the Policy proceeds. (Citations omitted.) 1836). Co. v. Tashire, 386 U.S. 523, 530 (1967). 1994); William Penn Life Ins. Interpleader is also allowed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 22. 1700 Lincoln Street #2400 Rule 11 requires that you have a good faith basis for believing an affirmative defense actually applies before pleading it, and in discovery you will likely need to respond to an interrogatory identifying all factual bases for every affirmative defense you plead. The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in New York Life v. Dunlevy 241 U.S. 518, that for a claimant to be bound by an interpleader that party must be served process in a way that obtains personal jurisdiction. Civil Lawsuit - Any lawsuit brought about in court in which one person says they have suffered a loss due to the actions of another person. Admitted. [17] This replaced the interpleader proceedings previously governed by the court rules by the procedure of "enforcement by taking control of goods" under newly passed regulations. Connect with me on LinkedIn. acquire the Defendant Answer To Complaint Affirmative Defenses And link that we meet the expense of here and check out the link. A: Here is a sample answer that can help you out. Statutory modifications to the procedure, which vary by jurisdiction, sometimes allow the stakeholder to retain the res pending final disposition of the case. The Trust refused to comply. An interpleader action is a lawsuit that is filed in county or circuit court in the jurisdiction where the escrowed funds are located. He has extensive experience representing plaintiffs and defendants in all types of complex business litigation throughout the United States. Co. of N.Y. v. Ansel, 273 A.D.2d 421 (2d Dept. 4. Such an action may be entertained although the titles or claims of the conflicting claimants do not have a common origin, or are not identical, but are adverse to and independent of one another. If you are interested in speaking to a Jimerson Birr lawyer or want general information about the firm, our practice areas, lawyers, publications, or events, please contact us via email or telephone for assistance at (904) 389-0050. An interpleader action originates when the plaintiff holds property on behalf of another, but does not know to whom the property should be transferred. No. An affirmative defense is a reason given by the defendant for why the plaintiff should not win the lawsuit, even if what the plaintiff says is true. SPV-LS illustrates that more is needed to hold the stakeholder liable a wrong independent of the interpleader action. The relief sought by Plaintiffs under Count II of the Complaint for Interpleader Bank 260 U.S. 235 sustained that a defensive interpeader in an action at law in federal court could be taken under Judicial Code section 274b added by 38Stat. c. 231, 85A imposes upon the defendant-registered owner of an automobile involved in a collision the responsibility for setting up as an affirmative defense in his answer a denial that the automobile was being operated by a person for whose conduct the defendant was legally responsible. Defendant affirmatively alleges that Plaintiff has failed to state a legal basis to discharge Plaintiff's insured from liability for [his/her] negligence or to restrain Defendants from initiating claims against Plaintiff's insured, and that any such relief should be denied. 2A/C, 155 F.R.D. Can your hotels employees cause an ADA lawsuit? The property in question is called the stake or res, and the third party who has custody of the stake is called the stakeholder. 8, 2008) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); Inovlotska v. Greenpoint Bank, 8 A.D.3d 623 (2d Dept. On April 22, 2014, Nachman sent Transamerica a letter in which Nachman claimed that he was the rightful Policy beneficiary, that he never transferred ownership of the Policy, and that he commenced legal proceedings to establish his ownership. Mar. Apr. Anderson's Ohio Civil Rules Practice with Forms is a desk reference that provides practicing attorneys and judges in Ohio with a manual to find quick and accurate answers to procedural questions under the Civil Rules. An affirmative defense is a defense in which the defendant introduces evidence, which, if found to be credible, will negate criminal liability or civil liability, even if it is proven that the defendant committed the alleged acts. Indus. Federal courts have held that because of the deposit of the res with the court an interpleader action is an action to determine the validity of competing claims to identified property that served may be under 28U.S.C. 1335(b). FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE As a fourth and separate affirmative defense to the complaint and to each purported cause of action contained therein, this answering Defendant alleges that this answering Defendant presently has insufficient knowledge or insufficient information upon which to form a belief as to whether he may have additional, yet un . This action is barred in whole or in part by the doctrines of res judicata and/or collateral estoppel. ;";(JCnMPu#(BHnY4&"(JQIA4yN ze^^3s>kyNt5-c*a9=EyhY;@-C$W2qHAUQbegk87l7e5+LJ3'sU
"n[.r+mrk'V'f(d0lOGIc#yGrmv&A;V~cM+J,QYiE&BC" /JIwv1^H{4j$MB. 0, 303-800-8888 SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (As to Count II - Interpleader) 37. Many affirmative defenses are listed in Rule 94 of the . For that reason, especially when the disputed funds are small like in residential real estate transactions, it may be in the best interest of even the legally right claimant to settle a dispute and accept a reduced amount before the interpleader action is filed. any known affirmative defense that it has available to it when it files its answer (Ky. R. Civ. - Noerr-Pennington defense (antitrust) (a Sherman Act defendant can raise the affirmative defense of right to petition for redress, even if they use that right to try to gain an anti-competitive advantage). If bill was not sent to patient prior to interpleader, then provider may not receive any monies. [any] matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense." and Complaint. An affirmative defense is a reason that the plaintiff should lose even if all of the claims are true. That Plaintiffs insured not be discharged from further liability. DEFENDANT IVETTE MONROIG'S ANSWER TO INTERPLEADER COMPLAINT Defendant Ivette Monroig, by and through her undersigned attorneys, hereby files the following Answer and Affirmative Defenses/Claims in response to Plaintiff's Interpleader Complaint: 1. Often times the buyers earnest money binder or deposit is being held by a third party escrow agent. In December 2009, FLS learned that the Trust failed to make a required premium payment to Transamerica, causing the Policy to enter a grace period, and that some of the Trusts representations and warranties were false at the time of the sale. To establish this claim, the plaintiff must prove all of the following: . Accordingly, while pleadings may be amended to add additional affirmative defenses, it is essential that all defenses to be raised at trial are pleaded before trial (ideally, at least a week prior to the deadline to serve written discovery in a case). 28 U.S. 1335 Interpleader: (a) the district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action of interpleader filed by any person, firm, or corporation, association, or society having in his or its custody or possession money or property of the value of $500 or more, or having issued a note, bond, certificate, or policy of . If the court finds the interpleader appropriate, the person filing the suit is dismissed from the case, the funds are deposited into the court registry, and the claimants to the funds litigate between themselves the issue of entitlement of the deposited monies. ___________, as owner of_________, derivatively on behalf of___________, and ______________, an Individual. must be based on wrongful conduct independent from the filing of an interpleader, or the retention of interpleaded assets pending direction from the court. Bank of New York v. First Millennium, Inc., No. The money or other property in controversy is called the res (a Latin word meaning object or thing). Consider each of the below affirmative defenses--does it potentially apply in your case? Court Holds That Filing An Interpleader Complaint Is Not An Actionable Wrong, The Anti-Retaliation Provisions Of The False Claims Act, Eligibility Under The IRS Whistleblower Program, The Process of Submitting A Whistleblower Claim, The Whistleblower Must Voluntarily Provide Original Information, The Whistleblowers Information Must Lead To a Successful Enforcement Action, The Confidentiality Protections Under The SEC/CFTC Whistleblower Program, Anti-Retaliation Under The SEC And CFTC Whistleblower Programs. Rule interpleader provides a remedy for any person who is, or may be exposed to double or multiple liabilities. Providing quality ADA Defense, Business & Real Estate Services throughout the United States for over 40 years. Statutory Interpleader governed by 28U.S.C. In some jurisdictions, the plaintiff is referred to as the plaintiff-in-interpleader and each claimant a claimant-in-interpleader. The stakeholder may be required to deposit the stake with the court and must notify the claimants that they can assert their ownership claims in court for determination. These procedure are outlined generally by Florida Realtors and include seeking an Escrow Disbursement Order, Arbitration, Mediation or Interpleader. A summary explanation of each defense listed is included with these instructions. 3. Enough with the fanfare, here's the (necessarily incomplete) list: - failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted (almost always use), - statutory defenses prerequisites (these will vary depending on the claims), - claimants own conduct, or by the conduct of its agents, representatives, and consultants, - fair consideration (fraudulent transfer), - fraud (generally, as an equitable defense, as opposed to fraud in the inducement, below), - restriction/rule/covenant was not reasonably/uniformly applied, - adequate remedy at law (claims in equity), - failure to mitigate damages (or, in some circumstances, successful mitigation of damages), - failing to plead fraud with particularity, - punitive damages not permissible/barred by statute, - punitive damages sought prematurely under statute, - collateral source rule (common law) or as codified in statute (see, e.g.,C.R.S. The Federal Interpleader Act of 1917 allowed an insurance company, or fraternal benefit society subject to multiple claims on the same policy to file a suit in equity by a bill of interpleader in United States district courts and providing nationwide service of process. Because the prosecutor or plaintiff has the burden of proving his case, a defendant can use a negating defense to bring . 1655 which authorize other forms of service to obtain in rem jurisdiction over absent defendants.[27]'. Id. For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. Orange County, Los Angeles County, San Diego County, Tustin County, San Francisco County, San Bernadino County, Kern County etc.). 2d 355, 362 (S.D.N.Y. Proc., 431.30 (b).) The party raising the affirmative defense has the burden of proof on establishing that it applies. As a third, separate, and affirmative defense to the unverified Complaint on file herein, these answering Defendants allege that they have incurred damages by reason of Plaintiffs conduct and that it has the right of offset of any amount of monies owed to Plaintiff by way of damages. In Texas, defendants must assert affirmative defenses in their Answer at the beginning of the case or risk not being able to use them later. 2008) (Although sanctioned by statute, interpleader is fundamentally an equitable remedy.). Kentucky requires that a party affirmatively state the following affirmative defenses, if applicable, in its answer: Accord and satisfaction. What follows is a some free legal information regarding the above titled matter for educational and discussion purposes only. a. Interpleader Defendant No. Charles B. Jimerson Under such circumstances, it is an improvident exercise of discretion for a court to discharge the stakeholder before the question of its alleged liability has been adjudicated. 13522 Newport Avenue, Suite 201Tustin, CA 92780, 1800 Century Park EastSuite 600Los Angeles, CA 90067, 4275 Executive Sq.Suite 200La Jolla, CA 92037, 177 Park AvenueSuite 200San Jose, CA 95113, 2023 The Karlin Law Firm LLP All Rights Reserved
Usl Soccer Coach Salary,
Nascar Drag Coefficient,
12 Disturbing Facts About The Titanic,
Articles A